As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face rising complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in belongings (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement belongings, DC plans carry important duty for guaranteeing sturdy monetary outcomes for members1. In 2025, plan sponsors should deal with optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant training to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody vital areas resembling goal date fund choice, payment transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation developments.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF selection2. Key takeaways embody:
Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluate
Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
Making the most of all obtainable data within the evaluate and decision-making course of
Documenting the method
Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to contemplate. First, as with every funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral developments — generally present in reviews produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce knowledge. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s objectives for the plan and general funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating varied TDFs. Making prudent funding choices requires these parts to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which can be appropriate to your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by means of the hassle of discovering an important funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio contains revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score towards its charges, quite than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan is likely to be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these selections or oversights end in plan members paying greater funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We propose plan sponsors contemplate the impression on members of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply higher payment transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding critiques comply with the same format: a have a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a evaluate of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of substitute, modifications are mentioned. Whereas routine critiques of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic evaluate of the funding lineup construction, which means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re applied with lively administration or passive administration. We propose this kind of evaluate no less than each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Common Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes needs to be altered. Components for the dialogue may embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Training Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examine, staff reported spending no less than three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
Now we have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages may also help staff enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a major function — notably for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants just isn’t at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff in search of individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Analyzing Committee Construction and Tasks
Employment developments from “the good resignation” to “the large keep” and “the good reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of right now’s workforce. These modifications additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may differ from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
Doc the committee construction and duties
Construct an onboarding training guidelines for brand spanking new committee members
Keep a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with training
Verify the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Traits in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand spanking new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement applications can include tax laws, so it will likely be vital for plan sponsors to remain present on potential modifications.
From a litigation standpoint, two main developments formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture belongings.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to observe plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the companies supplied? It is very important observe that this matter covers each vendor bills, resembling recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, resembling selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture belongings is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture belongings to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on prime of those and different developments in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for thousands and thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant training, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making might be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric introduced herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such data just isn’t assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution just isn’t registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
