The termination of federal grants supporting elevated web entry throughout the nation is reigniting considerations concerning the longstanding divide between college students who can entry digital instruments at residence and those that can’t.
The Federal Digital Fairness Grants program was axed this month after President Donald Trump referred to as the Biden-era legislation that created the funding “woke handouts” in a social media publish.
The grants had been part of Former President Joe Biden’s $1 trillion infrastructure invoice in 2021, which acquired bipartisan assist and included vital investments in web infrastructure, amongst different initiatives.
That effort was to incorporate round $42 billion for “broadband deployment grants” to convey web into low-connectivity areas and dedicate roughly $14 billion to serving to households in low-income areas hook up with broadband, Training Week reported on the time.
There was additionally initially round $2.75 billion earmarked for “digital fairness” — {dollars} that lawmakers stated could possibly be spent on something from laptops for college students to digital literacy courses for senior residents.
Because of the Trump administration’s efforts to repeal the laws, work that was both deliberate or simply starting in as many as 20 states is stalled.
In Illinois, for instance, the state’s $23.7 million digital fairness grant would have supported bettering the digital infrastructure for 10 million folks in rural areas and poorer communities, and rising entry for veterans and senior residents, a bunch of congressional and state leaders, together with Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker, stated in a press release.
For corporations promoting digital instruments to varsities, the lack of these initiatives may convey new challenges to an already unsure market.
Directors could lean extra closely on distributors or nonprofit companions to shut the digital gaps of their areas in terms of increasing connectivity, offering units, and providing strong offline performance, stated Julia Fallon, govt director of the State Academic Know-how Administrators Affiliation.
It may even have a common cooling impact on college districts’ curiosity in digital instruments if the scholars they serve are positioned in low-connectivity areas.
“When entry continues to be a barrier, curiosity in adopting new digital instruments can decline, both due to the logistical challenges or the notion that college students gained’t be capable to profit equitably,” Fallon stated in an e-mail. “That form of disillusionment may stall momentum at a time when continued funding is essential.”
SETDA is advocating for the grants to be reinstated, calling on federal and state leaders to “keep the course,” and arguing that gaining access to the web is crucial for studying, workforce readiness, and civic participation.
The standard of in-school web entry has risen over time, bolstered partially by the $4 billion federal E-rate program, which subsidizes phone, web, and associated initiatives for private and non-private colleges.
In its newest nationwide report on college connectivity, Join Ok-12, a instrument that aggregates E-rate information, discovered that three-quarters of faculty districts are reaching the nationwide benchmark for web connectivity in 2023, whereas solely round half of districts may say the identical three years earlier.
Getting all college students dependable web entry exterior of faculty — which some proponents hoped the digital fairness grants would assist work towards — has remained a problem.
The so-called digital divide particularly got here into focus through the COVID-19 pandemic, when some communities had been extra ready than others to transition to studying solely on-line.
“Equitable entry to expertise is just not a partisan concern — it’s a public good,” SETDA stated in a press release, responding to the minimize grants. “When all people have the instruments, infrastructure, and abilities to completely take part in fashionable society, everybody advantages.”
Be a part of Us for EdWeek Market Transient’s Digital Discussion board
Be a part of our digital discussion board June 10 & 11, 2025, to listen to instantly from college district leaders and business friends about essential tendencies enjoying out within the sector—and the assist college techniques want from training corporations.
States together with Connecticut, Illinois, Nevada, Alaska, Maine, Vermont, New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota had grant-backed initiatives that might be affected, SETDA reviews.
Trump didn’t provide a foundation for his criticism of this system or increase on what concerning the work was trigger for concern in his publish on Could 8.
In the identical publish, he promised to avoid wasting taxpayers “billions,” however it’s unclear what financial savings would really come to taxpayers by ending this system.
Authorities net pages that detailed the initiatives have since been eliminated. The Nationwide Telecommunications and Data Administration — the chief department company that advises the president on telecommunications and expertise coverage — beforehand oversaw the grants. However the company didn’t reply to EdWeek Market Transient’s request for touch upon Thursday, which included a query concerning the plans for any saved cash.
The White Home press workplace answered EdWeek Market Transient‘s questions concerning the digital fairness grants with a brief e-mail assertion about a wholly completely different subject.
This grant termination is a part of a wave of federal grant and program cancellations introduced over the previous few months by the Trump administration, which have focused the U.S. Division of Training and plenty of different businesses.
Trump has made it clear he’ll goal applications — together with teaching programs — labeled as selling variety, fairness, and inclusion, an method he typically believes unfairly places an emphasis on race in distributing cash and assets.
The digital fairness act language, nevertheless, hardly ever mentions race, and doesn’t make it a central issue within the distribution of funds.
